When considering materials for commercial construction projects, steel is often pitted against alternatives like concrete, timber, and masonry in a cost comparison. While steel may have a higher initial price tag, analyzing total cost of ownership over the long-term lifespan of the building reveals steel to offer better overall value.
Let's examine key cost factors at different stages with input from steel structure experts at Lida Group, who have delivered many profitable projects by emphasizing life-cycle affordability.
On material costs alone, concrete and timber appear cheaper than structural steel. However, steel requires less bulk to achieve the same strength profiles. Lighter steel frames demand shallow foundations, reducing excavation and concrete pouring costs.
Steel frames also allow wider spans, reducing total beam and column quantities versus rigid concrete frames. For a given building envelope, less total material volume keeps costs competitive to start.
Steel's major advantage lies in its speed of erection. Prefabricated, bolt-together components assemble like mechanical toys. Lida estimates erection rates 2-3x faster than concrete, slashing costly delays to occupancy and rental income starts.
Timber construction also progresses quickly but is limited to smaller buildings where wind and seismic loads don't overwhelm light wooden members. Steel scales to any size efficiently.
With a 50-year design life, operating expenses dominate total ownership costs. Steel structures require minimal long-term maintenance, unlike alternatives prone to corrosion, fire or pest damage over time.
Lida's steel workshops two decades earlier remain fully-functional with no major overhauls, versus replacing degraded timber componentspiecemeal. Steel also adapts flexibly to changing space needs through non-permanent partitions.
Energy expenditures also favor steel, with over 25% natural lighting penetration via vision glass versus concrete boxes dependent on artificial lighting 24/7.
Fire and Insurance
Steel's fire resistance avoids costly full-building replacements after incidents which gut timber or weaken concrete structures beyond economical repair. Insurance premiums against fire risk are accordingly much lower for steel buildings.
At the end of a 50-year design life, a well-maintained steel structure retains significant resale value due to adaptability to modernized uses. Concrete and timber shells with outdated structural grids hold little future value, typically demolished for new developments.
So while visible costs may favor other materials, factoring all ownership periods sees steel emerge as the most affordable long-term commercial building solution. Lida's track record confirms lower total costs of steel delivering stakeholder value for decades.
We are here to help you! If you close the chatbox, you will automatically receive a responsefrom us via email. Please be sure to leave yourcontact details so that we can better assist